There is no such thing as free and fair reporting. Humans are incapable of it and if you don't support that bold statement think about this - we perceive something through our senses, process it and then reproduce/report it. Let's imagine it as a three step process.
Imagine standing in front of a beautiful flower that has bloomed for the first time in the world and you are the first one to spot it and as part of your job you are supposed to report it.
The first task is to identify and take a call if it is a "beautiful flower". This decision is based on the prior knowledge conscious and sub-conscious, the prior norms, documented facts about the beautiful flowers which the reporter had access to previously. This is the first step and has already been biased a lot in the selection of what is important and needs to be reported.
Our senses process hundreds of TB of information daily. The beautiful lady in the silk dress, the red ferrari, the bird which just started chirpring, the smooth sweet taste of weiss beer, the bitterness of cheese and hundreds of things like that. This is the step one which I referred as "perceive". The flower was noticed - the eye saw it. Our mind simultaneously is "processing" information. This is where the real bias comes in and we decide if the perception was valuable or just ordinary.
A child is interested in the criss cross tiles in the big haul but as grown ups mom and dad are not at all interested in it. In his preachings Buddha describes as an ultimate state where by an individual is able to detach from the present and become just an observer. Difficult for most mere mortals I guess.
And the third step is to report it in an amicable manner. It's so interesting to note here that the emphasis is on amicable more than on the reporting.
And this is why am so concerned when I look around the world.
For example today I walked around Berlin. I have seen and read hundred of videos or books about the Berlin's days during the cold war. I guess all of us know that the Berlin wall was erected by East Germany to prevent people from the East i.e. communist to defecting into the west. I am not here to justify what why where. I have very limited understanding of the world history but I want to share something I always thought about but never found answers to.
Check out this video on the Berlin Wall. It will put things into perspective.
Let me ask a question here. Have you ever seen a video which showed what happened to the people who took the risk of crossing the wall. I haven't seen any information or documentary of there lives. And if that question is not enough think about hundreds who lost their lives doing so. Was it worth doing it. No one knows and we all have been fed to belief the life in West was good compared to East. And I guess over the period of so many years we have all soaked the information.
This is what media reporting does. No one feels the importance of reporting what is not happening in Tunisia. The reporting process that i discussed in the start still has to go through a filter of vested interest and propaganda be it economical or whatever. This is the thin red line where by revolutionary fighters like Azad before 1947 were referred to as "terrorists" in India and after that they have been acknowledged as "freedom fighters".
So the question is what is the real story of Libya? Why are the people willing to die in Chattisgarh? Who are these Maowadi - who are Naxalites. And we will never know because the media is allegedly in control of people like Barkha Dutta and Vir Sanghvi who have been tainted in the Radia Tapes.
So the question is whom do we trust and what to we make out of the news beaming into our living rooms. Information or propaganda and if you think you know - are you sure?
And the answer probably lies with in you and the question itself. Decide for yourself can we trust others?
3 comments:
excellent and engaging blog... text, diagrams and movie... however, I have a different opinion on some of the issues raised by you ... are consumers of information totally gullible to the vices? Do they accept infomation passively? I think it is not so. People have ability to interpret and innovate (one example in the movie was entering into house through door and jumping into West Berlin through window)... and the movie shows some of the examples ... Yes, I agree that the ability to decipher hidden agendas differ... anyway, the quality of blog is excellent
Thanks Vikasjee for the comments.
I agree that we all interpret information and we all are have different abilities when it comes to hidden agenda.
The growing concern is how come such important bits of pieces go missing. For example is it ever possible that no one ever thought that it was important to show what happened to these East Germans after they "crossed" the wall. And am sure am not the first one to notice this.
Ek purani kahwat hai jhoot baar baar suno to sach jaisa sunaye dene lagta hai. If we are not careful and attentive these intelligent omission of information could be potentially hazardous.
And you would have surely noticed that I have not talked about the ownership and commercial interests of the media and companies owning them.
I guess we are moving towards a society which will have loads of information but it will be very difficult to know fact from fiction and to some extent even today the fiction of an American (say Avatar movie) is to some extent the reality in Chattisgarh (Cairn -Vedanta).
Post a Comment